PIP Appeal: Paper Hearing vs Oral, Phone, and Video Hearings
The four hearing formats
When you lodge your PIP appeal, you can say whether you want an oral hearing. If you do, select which formats suit you; the tribunal decides the type of oral hearing. The options are:
Oral hearing (in person): You attend a tribunal venue near you and sit in a hearing room with the panel. This is the traditional format and the most common.
Video hearing: You join the hearing from home using the HMCTS Video Hearings Service on a laptop, tablet, or phone. The panel sits together at the venue and sees you on screen.
Phone hearing: You participate by telephone. You cannot see the panel and they cannot see you, but you can answer questions and give oral evidence.
Paper determination: The tribunal decides your case on the written evidence, without you attending an oral hearing.
You indicate whether you want an oral hearing in Section 6 of the SSCS1 form and, if you do, select suitable formats in Section 6a. You can ask to change your preference later by writing to HMCTS.
What an oral hearing lets you do
An oral hearing — whether in person, by video, or by phone — lets you explain your appeal and answer questions from the panel. Published MoJ statistics do not compare PIP success rates for oral and paper hearings.
In unpublished DWP data for hearings cleared in 2021 and 2022 (to March), 59% of overturned decisions were attributed to the tribunal reaching a different conclusion on substantially the same facts, and 32% to cogent oral evidence. DWP recorded only one reason per appeal, so these figures may not give the full story. When the panel hears directly from you about what your mornings look like, how you manage on bad days, and what help you actually receive, they get information that written documents alone cannot provide.
A paper determination relies entirely on what is already in the file — the DWP's bundle, your written submission, and any medical letters you submitted. If the evidence is strong enough on paper, you can win. But if there is any ambiguity, any gap, or any point where the panel might want to ask a follow-up question, you lose the chance for them to do so.
Choosing between in-person, video, and phone
In person gives the panel the fullest picture. They see how you move, whether you use aids, how you manage sitting for the duration of the hearing, and how you interact. For many appellants, being in the room also feels more personal and allows better communication.
Video is a good compromise if travelling to a venue is difficult, painful, or anxiety-inducing. You give oral evidence from your own environment, and the panel can see your facial expressions and body language. Test your internet connection and camera beforehand. Find a quiet, well-lit room. Make sure someone will not walk in during the hearing.
Phone removes the visual element entirely. The panel cannot see you, which means they miss physical cues — how you hold yourself, whether you use aids, whether you are visibly in pain. Phone hearings work for conditions that are primarily cognitive or psychiatric where the key evidence is what you say, not what the panel observes. They are also a last resort if you cannot manage video or in-person attendance.
Free Download
Get the PIP Tribunal Appeal Checklist
Everything in this article as a printable checklist — plus action plans and reference guides you can start using today.
When paper might make sense
The tribunal can decide a case without an oral hearing if each party has consented or has not objected and the tribunal considers it can decide the matter without a hearing.
If your case involves any dispute about the severity or frequency of your difficulties, any question about whether you meet the reliability criteria, or any factual disagreement with the PA4 assessment report, a paper determination puts you at a disadvantage.
Some appellants request paper because they are too anxious to attend. If that is your situation, consider a video hearing with reasonable adjustments — frequent breaks, a companion on screen with you, afternoon scheduling — before giving up oral evidence entirely. Published MoJ statistics do not show a success-rate difference between the formats.
Changing your preference
If you chose paper on the SSCS1 and later decide you want an oral hearing (or vice versa), write to HMCTS with your appeal reference number. The tribunal can also convert a paper case to an oral hearing if the judge reviewing the file considers that oral evidence is needed to decide fairly.
The PIP Tribunal Appeals guide covers preparation for each hearing format, including what to set up for a video hearing, what the panel can and cannot see during a phone hearing, and how to request a format change.
Get Your Free PIP Tribunal Appeal Checklist
Download the PIP Tribunal Appeal Checklist — a printable guide with checklists, scripts, and action plans you can start using today.