PIP Written Submission Example: How to Write Your Tribunal Statement

Why a written submission matters

You do not have to send a written submission before your PIP tribunal hearing. But doing so gives the panel time to read your arguments, understand the specific errors in the DWP's decision, and arrive at the hearing with focused questions rather than starting from scratch.

A clear, structured submission tells the panel exactly where the decision went wrong and points them to the evidence that proves it. It saves time during the hearing and ensures your key points are on the record even if nerves or fatigue make it hard to speak on the day.

Structure your submission around the disputed descriptors

The most effective format is to organise your submission by each PIP activity where you disagree with the DWP's scoring. For each one:

1. State the decision you are challenging. Name the activity, the descriptor the DWP applied, and the points they awarded.

2. Explain the factual errors. Reference specific page numbers in the DWP response bundle where the assessment report or decision letter got your situation wrong. For example: "The PA4 report at page 34 states I can prepare a meal independently. In practice, I cannot safely use a hob because of tremors in both hands. My occupational therapist's letter at page 72 confirms this."

3. Identify the correct descriptor. State which descriptor you believe should apply and the points it carries.

4. Apply the reliability criteria. The tribunal assesses whether you can carry out each activity safely, repeatedly, to an acceptable standard, and within a reasonable time. Address each test that is relevant. If you can cook a meal on a good day but it takes two hours and leaves you unable to do anything else, say so — that fails the "reasonable time" and "repeatedly" tests.

5. Reference your supporting evidence. Point the panel to specific documents: GP letters, consultant reports, therapy notes, your own daily diary entries. Use bundle page numbers wherever possible.

Keep it factual and specific

The strongest submissions describe concrete daily realities. "I struggle with washing" is vague. "I cannot get in and out of the bath without my partner lifting me, and on three or four days a week I use wet wipes instead of washing because I cannot stand for the time it takes to shower" gives the panel something they can assess against the descriptors.

Avoid legal jargon unless you are confident in how the regulations work. Plain language describing what actually happens in your daily life is more persuasive than borrowed legal phrases. The panel includes a qualified judge who handles the law — your job is to give them the facts.

Do not exaggerate. Do not describe your worst possible day as if it is every day. Tribunal panels assess credibility, and an account that does not ring true undermines everything else in your case. Describe your typical day honestly, explain what bad days look like and how often they happen, and let the evidence speak.

When to send it

For a submission replying to the DWP's response, Rule 24(7) requires you to provide it to the tribunal within one month after the DWP sent you its response. The rules do not set a general deadline for other written submissions, but sending yours at least seven to fourteen days before the hearing gives the panel time to read it properly. Evidence sent on the hearing day itself may be admitted, but the panel might not have time to absorb it fully.

Send your submission to HMCTS with your appeal reference number on every page, and send a copy to the DWP at the same time. Keep a copy for yourself to refer to at the hearing.

You can still speak at the hearing

A written submission does not replace your oral evidence — it supports it. The panel will still ask you questions at the hearing. Having your submission in front of them means those questions can be more targeted, and you spend less time trying to explain the basics of your situation under pressure.

The PIP Tribunal Appeals guide includes a submission framework worksheet that walks you through each activity, with prompts for the PA4 errors, the correct descriptor, and the reliability criteria — designed to help you build a clear, page-referenced statement without starting from a blank page.

See more England and Wales guides →